Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Clinical Practice Guidelines on Popliteal Artery Aneurysms

“Popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) are the most common peripheral arterial aneurysms, defined as aneurysms outside the aortoiliac system or the brain, accounting for 70% of all peripheral arterial aneurysms. They are more common in men (95%) and tend to occur in the sixth and seventh decades of life. Few modern studies have been performed on the natural history of PAAs, and many of these were retrospective reviews of surgical patients. As such, the timing and details of PAA management remain nuanced.”

“These guidelines focus on PAA screening, indications for intervention, choice of repair strategy, management of asymptomatic and symptomatic PAAs (including those presenting with acute limb ischemia), and follow-up of both untreated and treated PAAs. They offer long-awaited evidence-based recommendations for physicians taking care of these patients.”

Table. Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines on popliteal artery aneurysms: recommendations

InvestigatorPopulationInterventionsOutcomesMethodologic quality
Recommendation 1:We recommend that patients who present with a PAA are screened for both a contralateral PAA and an AAA (grade 1B)
 Dawson et al,1 1997Patients with PAAs (review of literature)VariableFor >1600 cases reported, average rate of bilateral PAA was 50%, and average rate of associated AAAs was 36%Mix of mostly retrospective and a few prospective studies
 Tsilimparis et al,2 2013Tabular review of series of PAA patientsVariableIn >2600 patients from studies reported in previous 25 years, average rate of bilateral PAA was 48% and of concomitant AAA was 38%Mix of mostly retrospective and a few prospective studies
Recommendation 2:We recommend that patients with an asymptomatic PAA >20 mm in diameter should undergo repair to reduce the risk of thromboembolic complications and limb loss (grade 1B). For selected patients at higher clinical risk, repair can be deferred until the PAA has become >30 mm, especially in the absence of thrombus (grade 2C)
 Cousins et al,16 2018Asymptomatic PAAs treated for ≥1 year of medical and observational management before repairVariable87 PAAs in 65 patients were evaluated; mean initial diameter at diagnosis was 16.9 mm; multivariable analysis determined that initial diameter (OR, 5.53; P = .007) and presence or development of mural thrombus (OR, 4.00; P = .008) independently predicted for PAA diameter growthRetrospective study
 Lowell et al,17 1994Consecutive patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic PAAsVariable161 PAAs in 106 patients were followed up for a mean of 6.7 years (range, 3 days to 12.1 years); 15 limbs presented with acute symptoms, 52 with chronic symptoms, and 94 were asymptomatic; ≥1 of 3 risk factors (size, >2 cm, thrombus, poor runoff) was initially present in 11 of 12 limbs (91.7%) compared with 9 of 24 control limbs (37.5%) that remained asymptomatic (P < .05)Retrospective study
 Galland et al,29 2005Consecutive patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic PAAVariable116 PAAs in 73 patients, 39 (34%) with acute ischemia; size and distortion were greater in PAAs presenting with acute ischemia than in asymptomatic PAAs (P < .01); degree of distortion differentiated symptomatic from asymptomatic PAAs (P = .0066); size was not significantly different between these 2 groups; for PAA ≥3 cm in diameter with ≥45° distortion, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for thrombosis were 90%, 89%, 83%, and 94%, respectivelyProspective study
Recommendation 3: We suggest that for patients with a PAA <20 mm, in the presence of thrombus and clinical suspicion of embolism or imaging evidence of poor distal runoff, repair should be considered to prevent thromboembolic complications and possible limb loss (grade 2C)
 Ascher et al,30 200334 PAAs in 25 patients; 14 (41%) had no symptoms (group 1) and 20 (59%) had symptoms (group 2)Bypass surgeryPAA diameter averaged 2.8 ± 0.7 cm (range, 1.8-4.5 cm) in group 1 and 2.2 ± 0.8 cm (range, 1.3-4.0 cm) in group 2 (P < .03); PAA thrombosis was present in 7 of 20 limbs in group 2; 4 of these patients had ipsilateral SFA thrombosis; evaluation of infrapopliteal arteries in group 1 showed 3-vessel runoff in 7 limbs, 2-vessel runoff in 3 limbs, 1-vessel runoff in 2 limbs, and no vessel runoff in 2 limbs; all infrapopliteal arteries were either occluded or significantly stenotic in 14 limbs (70%); in group 2, 1-vessel runoff was observed in 5 limbs, and 2-vessel runoff in 1 limbRetrospective study
 Dawson et al,20 1994Asymptomatic PAAsObservation42 Patients with mean PAA diameter of 3.1 cm (range, 1.8-8.0 cm); 1 or both ankle pulses were absent in 18/42 limbs; during follow-up, 25/42 asymptomatic PAAs under observation had complications at mean observation of 18 months (range, 1 day to 65 months); absent ankle pulses at initial examination significantly predicted for natural history of asymptomatic PAA; risk of complications was also greater with increasing diameter (≥2 cm)Retrospective study
Recommendation 4: For asymptomatic patients with a life expectancy of ≥5 years, we suggest open PAA repair, provided that an adequate saphenous vein is present; for patients with a diminished life expectancy, if intervention is indicated, endovascular repair should be considered (grade 2C)
 Garg et al,31 201221 PAA patientsEPAR3 Graft failures of 20 procedures; open thrombectomy (n = 2) and femorotibial bypass (n = 1); significantly increased graft failure rate with 1-compared with 2- or 3-vessel runoffRetrospective study; moderate methodologic quality
 Serrano Hernando et al,32 2015171 PAAs in 142 men; 53.3% asymptomatic139 OPAR, 32 EPAR27 Occlusions (14.4% OPAR, 21.8% EPAR); only variable associated with patency on multivariate analysis was poor runoffRetrospective study; moderate methodologic quality
 Beuschel et al,33 2020Meta-analysis of mainly nonrandomized studies (1 small RCT) showed that, compared with EPAR, OPAR was associated with greater primary patency at 1 year (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.45-3.14) and 3 years (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.99-2.01), lower occlusion rate at 30 days (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.24-0.68), and fewer reinterventions but longer hospital stay and more wound complications; no significant difference was found in mortality (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.06-1.36 at 30 days; OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.21-1.17 at longest follow up), secondary patency (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.92-3.07 at 1 year), or amputation rate (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.56-1.31) between OPAR and EPAR; certainty for these estimates was, in general, lowSystematic review of 1 high risk of bias RCT and observational studies
 Eslami et al,34 2015Asymptomatic PAAs in VQI from 2010 to 2013221 OPAR, 169 EPAR; MALE, loss of primary patency, and MALE-free survival were comparedOPAR patients had significantly greater MALE-free survival (95% vs 80%; P < .001) and MALE-POD–free survival (93% vs 80%; P < .001) rates at 1 year after procedure; OPAR was associated with lower hazard of MALE (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.86; P < .05), MALE-POD (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.13-0.63; P < .05), and primary patency loss (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10-0.58; P < .05)Retrospective, multi-institutional registry study; moderate methodologic quality
 Galinanes et al,35 2013PAA repair in Medicare beneficiaries, 2005-2007Comparison of 2962 Medicare patients after OPAR (n = 2413) and EPAR (n = 549); reintervention rates, LOS, and chargesGreater LOS and hospital charges for OPAR; greater 30- and 90-day reinterventions for EPAR (4.6% vs 2.1%; P = .001; 11.8% vs 7.4%; P = .0007, respectively)Retrospective administrative database; moderate to low methodologic quality
 Pulli et al,36 2012PAA repairComparison of 43 OPAR and 21 EPAR outcomesEqual outcomes across all compared between OPAR and EPARRetrospective single-institution analysis; moderate methodologic quality
 Pulli et al,37 2013PAA repairComparison of 178 OPAR and 134 EPAR outcomes, including primary patency and limb lossSimilar outcomes noted between OPAR and EPARRetrospective multi-institution analysis; moderate methodologic quality
 Leake et al,38 2017PAA repairMeta-analysis of 14 studies, including 4880 PAA repairs (OPAR, 3915; EPAR, 1210)OPAR had longer LOS (SMD, 2.158; 95% CI, 1.225-3.090; P < .001) and fewer reinterventions (OR, 0.275; 95% CI, 0.166-0.454; P < .001); primary patency was better for OPAR at 1 and 3 years (RR, 0.607 [P = .01]; RR, 0.580 [P = .006], respectively); no difference in secondary patency at 1 and 3 years (RR, 0.770 [P = .458]; RR, 0.642 [P = .073], respectively)Systematic review of one low-quality RCT and observational studies
 Antonello et al,39 2005Patients with PAA15 OPAR, 15 EPAR, comparison of outcomesSimilar outcomes between OPAR and EPARSingle-center, prospective randomized trial of low power but appropriate method
Recommendation 5: We recommend that intervention for thrombotic and/or embolic complications of PAA be stratified by the severity of ALI at presentation. We recommend that patients with mild to moderate ALI (Rutherford grade I and IIa) and severely obstructed tibiopedal arteries undergo thrombolysis or pharmacomechanical intervention to improve runoff status, with prompt transition to definitive PAA repair. We recommend that patients with severe ALI (Rutherford grade IIb) should undergo prompt surgical or endovascular PAA repair, with the use of adjunctive surgical thromboembolectomy or pharmacomechanical intervention to maximize tibiopedal outflow. Nonviable limbs (Rutherford grade III) require amputation (grade 1B)
 Marty et al,40 200212 Patients with ALI, Rutherford grade IIa; 1 with ALI, Rutherford grade IIbAll patients received preoperative thrombolysisThrombolysis failures (3/13) predicted for bypass failure and AKA; thrombolysis for ALI IIb resulted in rhabdomyolysis and deathRetrospective study; moderate methodologic quality
 Pulli et al,41 200617 Patients with ALI, Rutherford grade I-IIa; 19 with ALI, Rutherford grade IIb17 Patients with Rutherford grade I-IIa received preoperative lysis; 19 with Rutherford grade IIb underwent open repair11/17 Thrombolysis patients (64.5%) had restoration of patency of PAA and ≥1 tibial vesselRetrospective study; moderate methodologic quality
 Kropman et al,23 2010895 Patients with ALI (122 with Rutherford grade noted: 101, IIa; 18, IIb; 3, III)313, Lysis (255 preoperatively); 551, OPAR; 31, primary amputationPre- and intraoperative thrombolysis plus bypass yielded improved graft patency rates at 1 year but no change in amputation rates compared with surgical thrombectomy plus bypassSystematic review (8 prospective, 25 retrospective); good methodologic quality
 Pulli et al,37 201351 Patients with ALI: 40, Rutherford grade I-IIa; 11, IIbPatients with I-IIa received lysis then repair (30 OPAR; 10 EPAR); patients with IIb received OPARAt 48 months, limb salvage was 81.5%Multicenter retrospective study; moderate methodologic quality
 Dorigo et al,42 200224 Patients with ALI, Rutherford grade I-IIa10 Patients received OPAR; 14, lysis followed by OPARPerioperative (30-day) limb salvage was 70% for OPAR, which improved to 86% with addition of thrombolysisRetrospective comparative study; moderate methodologic quality
 Dorigo et al,43 201813 Patients with ALI (8 with Rutherford grade I-IIa)8 Patients treated with lysis6/8 (75%) SuccessfulRetrospective multicenter study; moderate methodologic quality
 Huang et al,44 2007358 Cases of PAA in 289 patients; 74 (21%) with ALI74 Patients with ALI; 24 received preoperative lysis30-Day primary patency for ALI grade II patients increased with lysis (96% ± 4% vs 80% ± 9%)Retrospective, single-center study; moderate methodologic quality
Recommendation 6: We recommend that patients who undergo OPAR or EPAR should be followed up using clinical examination, ankle brachial index (ABI), and DUS at 3, 6, and 12 months during the first postoperative year and, if stable, annually thereafter. In addition to DUS evaluation of the repair, the aneurysm sac should be evaluated for evidence of enlargement. If abnormalities are found on clinical examination, ABI, or DUS, appropriate clinical management according to the lower extremity endovascular or open bypass guidelines should be undertaken (grade 1B). If compressive symptoms or symptomatic aneurysm sac expansion are noted, we suggest surgical decompression of the aneurysm sac (grade 1C)
 Zierler et al,45 2018SVS review of multiple endovascular and open lower extremity revascularization proceduresDUS, ABI, and physical examination surveillance recommended at 1, 6, and 12 months, then annuallyNumerous studies (≥2300) have demonstrated that identifying and repairing graft-threatening lesions prolongs bypass patencyRetrospective and meta-analysis
 Stone et al,46 200555 Patients with PAAsDUS at discharge, every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 monthsOne third of PAAs repaired by OPAR or EPAR required secondary intervention within 2 yearsRetrospective review; moderate methodologic quality
 Piazza et al,47 201446 EPARsDUS surveillance at 1, 6, 12 months, then annually11 Stent-graft failures; 63% within first yearRetrospective review; moderate methodologic quality
 Davies et al,48 201048 Patients with 63 PAAsDUS surveillance but no schedule reported5 PAAs with flow into sac and aneurysm growthRetrospective review; moderate methodologic quality
Recommendation 7: We suggest that patients with an asymptomatic PAA who are not offered repair should be monitored annually for changes in symptoms, pulse examination, extent of thrombus, patency of the outflow arteries, and aneurysm diameter (grade 2C)
 Dawson et al,20 199442 Patients with asymptomatic PAAsMonitored for symptoms and complications24% Developed complications within 1 year, and 68% developed complications due to PAAs within 5 years; absence of ankle pulses was a strong predictor of complicationsRetrospective case series
 Ascher et al,30 200334 Patients identified retrospectively with PAAVariableSize did not accurately predict for complications; aneurysms <2 cm still posed risk of thrombosis and complicationsRetrospective case series
 Dawson et al,1 1997Review of 13 retrospective case series; 437 aneurysms totalVariableComplications developed at a mean observation time of 18 months; complication rate varied, 8%-100%; amputation rate with complications, 25%Retrospective case series
 Schröder et al,49 1996Retrospective review of 217 patientsVariable53% of patients treated conservatively were free of symptoms at 5 yearsRetrospective case series
 Farina et al,50 1989Retrospective review of 50 aneurysmsVariable36% of 14 patients treated conservatively had complications at a mean of 26 monthsRetrospective case series
AAA, Abdominal aortic aneurysm; ABI, ankle brachial index; AKA, above the knee amputation; ALI, acute limb ischemia; CI, confidence interval; DUS, duplex ultrasound; EPAR, endovascular popliteal artery aneurysm repair; HR, hazard ratio; LOS, length of stay; MALE, major adverse limb events; OPAR, open popliteal artery aneurysm repair; OR, odds ratio; PAA, popliteal artery aneurysm; POD, perioperative death; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RR, relative risk; SFA, superficial femoral artery; SMD, standardized mean difference; SVS, Society for Vascular Surgery; VQI, Vascular Quality Initiative.

Farber, Alik et al. “The Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines on popliteal artery aneurysms.” Journal of vascular surgery vol. 75,1S (2022): 109S-120S. Free Full Text.

Leave a comment