Powell JT, Wanhainen A. Analysis of the Differences Between the ESVS 2019 and NICE 2020 Guidelines for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Jul;60(1):7-15.
Full-text for Emory users.
See also: Surgical Grand Rounds: EVAR, FEVAR, and Open Repair: What to make of alphabet soup
Acher C, et al. Operative Mortality and Morbidity in Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the Endovascular Age. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;66:70-76.
Deery SE, et al. Transabdominal open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is associated with higher rates of late reintervention and readmission compared with the retroperitoneal approach. J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;71(1):39-45.e1.
Briggs CS, et al. Short-term and midterm survival of ruptured abdominal aortic
aneurysms in the contemporary endovascular era. J Vasc Surg. 2018 Aug;68(2):408-414.e1.
Rowbotham SE, et al. Inositol in the MAnaGemENt of abdominal aortic aneurysm (IMAGEN): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Nov 16; 18(1):547.
IMPROVE Trial Investigators. Comparative clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of endovascular strategy vs. open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: three year results of the IMPROVE randomised trial. BMJ. 2017 Nov 14;359:j4859.
Ambler GK, et al. Survival following ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm before and during the IMPROVE Trial: a single-centre series. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Apr;47(4):388-93.
Reimerink JJ, et al.; Amsterdam Acute Aneurysm Trial Collaborators. Endovascular repair versus open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a
multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2013 Aug;258(2):248-56.
Brown LC, et al. The UK EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) trials: randomised trials of EVAR versus standard therapy. Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(9):1-218.
Pingback: Article of interest: Comparison of outcomes with open, fenestrated, and chimney graft repair of juxtarenal aneurysms: are we ready for a paradigm shift? | Surgical Focus