Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy Significantly Improves Clinical Outcomes of Anastomotic Leakages After Esophagectomies

“Anastomotic leakages continue to be a highly challenging complication in esophageal surgery. According to the literature, the risk of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy ranges between 4 and 35%. The location of the anastomotic leakage is a significant factor in determining patient outcomes. Notwithstanding, cervical anastomoses bear a higher risk for leakage; the consequences of an intrathoracic (mediastinal) leakage are usually more devastating. A leakage into the thoracic cavity typically leads to mediastinitis and severe pneumonia and contributes to the significant mortality rates in esophageal surgery. In contrast, cervical anastomotic leakages tend to frequently present as wound infections often only requiring external drainage”

“The clinical outcomes strongly depend on an early diagnosis and appropriate treatment, which can extent over several weeks or even months. In the past, the mainstay of treatment was based on surgical repair, external drainage of sepsis via chest tubes, and interventional treatment modalities like endoscopic stent deployment or clipping. In 2008, endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure (eVAC) therapy was successfully applied in patients with anastomotic leakages after esophagectomies. As in other vacuum-assisted wound therapies, eVAC cleans the defect by reducing the amount of exudative fluids and necrotic tissue, thus accelerating the healing process by contributing to a better local perfusion as well as through the formation of granulation tissue.”

Continue reading

Splenic injury grades & management

“Management of blunt spleen injuries has evolved from mandatory splenectomy to non-operative management (NOM) allowing for splenic salvage. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) practice management guideline for the management of blunt solid organ injury recommends NOM in splenic injury regardless of age, grade, or associated injuries.”

“Splenectomy continues to be the treatment of choice in patients with unstable hemodynamics and a known splenic injury. In the hemodynamically normal patient, current practice is to observe the patient and treat with NOM to save the patients the complications associated with surgery.”

Continue reading

Retained wound VAC material as complication of abdominoplasty

With large cavitating wounds, there is a risk of sponge retention that may be all too easily
overlooked, particularly with the surgeons’ habit of cutting the sponge to the desired shape and the use of multiple fragments. We therefore recommend that a count is made of the number of sponges used – as is standard practise for swabs, needles and instruments.

Continue reading

Negative pressure wound therapy versus standard care for incisionallaparotomy subcutaneous wounds

“Surgical site infections after gastrointestinal perforation with peritonitis have significant
morbidity, increased hospital stays, and cost of treatment. The appropriate management of these wounds is still debatable.”

“In this single-center randomized controlled trial, we found that the use of NPWT on the surgical incision in patients with GIP significantly reduced the rate of SSI and wound dehiscence. The overall incidence of SSI in the present study was 38.5%. The use of
NPWT also significantly increased the rate of delayed primary wound closure and improved wound healing time.”

Continue reading

Effects of honey compared to silver sulfadiazine for the treatment of burns

“Topical dressings containing honey as well as silver sulfadiazine (SSD) have re-emerged as a treatment option for burn wound management. Honey is postulated to facilitate wound healing by its chemical debridement and anti-inflammatory action, and its ability to create a viscous barrier on the wound surface thus preventing the invasion of micro-organisms. Meanwhile, SSD may be considered as the gold standard for topical burn treatment. In contrast to honey, silver-containing dressings are capable of absorbing the burn exudates and releasing silver which has been recognized as an effective antimicrobial agent against a broad range of bacteria, yeast, and viruses. However, recent findings have shown that topical silver delays rather than promotes wound healing and is associated with potentially severe adverse effects.”

Continue reading